|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
Dev Shed Forums Sponsor:
|
|
|
|
#1
June 3rd, 2001, 07:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Apache+Mod-ssl vs Apache-ssl
Greetings All,
I have a choice between using Apache with Mod-ssl or Apache-ssl with virtual hosting (to allow http and https access). Does anyone have any comments on this choice? Apache-ssl is easier to set up, but Apache and Mod-ssl seems more like "industry standard." Any comments welcome. Thanks, Zitan.
|
|
#2
June 4th, 2001, 02:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I prefer mod_ssl simply because it's more flexible. In most case, Apache-SSL would be built statically (not as a share module). For performance wise, yes, it's more efficient technically. The down side is that you need to recompile it everytime you add/upgrade additional modules.
Should Apache-SSL be built as a share module using DSO method, it's just better off not to use it and go for mod_ssl instead.
|
|
| Viewing: Dev Shed Forums > System Administration > Apache Development > Apache+Mod-ssl vs Apache-ssl |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
 |
|
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
