The Shed is going Social! Join us on FaceBook and Twitter and chime in on the conversation.
|
 |
|
Dev Shed Forums
> Programming Languages - More
> ColdFusion Development
|
Fronpage vs. Cold Fusion
Discuss Fronpage vs. Cold Fusion in the ColdFusion Development forum on Dev Shed. Fronpage vs. Cold Fusion ColdFusion Development forum discussing CFML coding practices, tips on CFML, and other CFML related topics. Find out why ColdFusion is the tool of choice for many e-commerce developers.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

Dev Shed Forums Sponsor:
|
|
|

September 30th, 2003, 08:48 PM
|
|
Contributing User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 121
Time spent in forums: 3 m 36 sec
Reputation Power: 10
|
|
|
Fronpage vs. Cold Fusion
I used Frontpage and build a couple of pages. The fronpage code generates file that can be accessible by IE but when I tried to access the same page from Linux using Mozilla the pages looked ugly.
I looked on the frontpage code and the code was not clear html code and to do any kind of modification was difficult.
What kind of code Coldfusion creates compare to frontpage? Is it clear HTML code or Coldfusion version of HTML?
Thanks
|

October 1st, 2003, 12:24 AM
|
 |
Capt'n
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 567
  
Time spent in forums: 9 h 40 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 13
|
|
|
Front page codes to MSIE browsers only. Coldfusion is a programming language that is embeded into an HTML document, not an editor like Frontpage or Dreamwaver. So in that respect Coldfusion is like PHP, PERL, C++, ASP and not frontpage.
If you looking for a good WYSIWYG program to create webpages I like Adobe GoLive. Dreamweaver has too many features, but is more advanced, plus I work a lot with "design" firms that create cool pages in photoshop, then I turn those cool pictures into website coding. Actully I just import the files into Adobe GoLive and it does 90% of the work for me.
|

October 1st, 2003, 09:55 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
|
|
Frontpage is a WYSIWYG HTML code generator. ColdFusion is an application server. You are comparing apples to oranges.
So...you might compare FrontPage to Dreamweaver. You might compare ColdFusion to PHP or ASP.NET. But you would not compare FrontPage to ColdFusion.
|

October 1st, 2003, 10:34 AM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
|
|
Re: Fronpage vs. Cold Fusion
Quote: Originally posted by mikerh9
I used Frontpage and build a couple of pages. The fronpage code generates file that can be accessible by IE but when I tried to access the same page from Linux using Mozilla the pages looked ugly.
|
The issue here is that Frontpage - a Microsoft product - was specifically designed to output HTML code that will not work in any other browser other than Internet Explorer (another Microsoft product). You should learn to create HTML by hand before using a commercial WYSINWYG editor, so you can discern the quality of the HTML the editor is producing on your own.
Quote:
I looked on the frontpage code and the code was not clear html code and to do any kind of modification was difficult.
|
Abandon Frontpage. Delete it off of your PC, today. Buy a book on HTML, learn it yourself, and code by hand. Frontpage can only harm you in the long run.
Quote:
What kind of code Coldfusion creates compare to frontpage? Is it clear HTML code or Coldfusion version of HTML?
Thanks |
I think this has already been answered.
I will add this, however - if you're coming from a non-programming background, and you're looking to add some dynamic features to your website - such as drawing content from a database, for instance - and the only "programming" you've done is HTML, then ColdFusion is the perfect language for you to learn.
It is tag-based, just like HTML, so the syntax should come quickly to you. It can be imbedded directly in an HTML document. It has fairly robust features, and can run on a wide variety of servers, as well as connect to a wide variety of databases.
|

October 1st, 2003, 01:55 PM
|
 |
Capt'n
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 567
  
Time spent in forums: 9 h 40 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 13
|
|
|
Re: Re: Fronpage vs. Cold Fusion
Quote: Originally posted by drgroove
It [coldfusion] has fairly robust features, and can run on a wide variety of servers, as well as connect to a wide variety of databases. |
Edit: Wide varity of Windows Based servers.
No coldfusion app server for Linux/BSD/Solaris/HP UX/AIX or any other *iux based platform.
So if one decides to use CFML, your limited to windows-based servers only, which is why I gave up on CF for PHP about three years ago.
Its a shame though, if macromedia had ported the engine to *iux, chances are a majority of dymanic pages today would be in CFML, not PHP, because CFML is easier to learn and use from my expirance.
__________________
Why? Because Forms just look cooler in OS X...
Dutch, it's like German...but not!
|

October 1st, 2003, 02:27 PM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Fronpage vs. Cold Fusion
Quote: Originally posted by kfickert
Edit: Wide varity of Windows Based servers.
No coldfusion app server for Linux/BSD/Solaris/HP UX/AIX or any other *iux based platform.
So if one decides to use CFML, your limited to windows-based servers only, which is why I gave up on CF for PHP about three years ago.
Its a shame though, if macromedia had ported the engine to *iux, chances are a majority of dymanic pages today would be in CFML, not PHP, because CFML is easier to learn and use from my expirance. |
We run ColdFusion MX on a Solaris server at my work as our intranet.
The ColdFusion MX engine is entirely Java based, and will basically run on any server you want to run it on. Cross-platform portability is actually one of CFML's core strengths, in addition to being easy-to-learn from HTML programming newbies.
|

October 1st, 2003, 02:28 PM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
|
|

October 1st, 2003, 11:51 PM
|
 |
Capt'n
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 567
  
Time spent in forums: 9 h 40 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 13
|
|
|
That's a new feature then. Previously with 4 & 5 it was for NT only...
|

October 2nd, 2003, 08:22 AM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by kfickert
That's a new feature then. Previously with 4 & 5 it was for NT only... |
Yeah, I figured as much... I know that the MX version is the first to run off of Java, which is likely one of the core reasons Macromedia moved to Java (portability).
|

October 2nd, 2003, 09:33 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by kfickert
That's a new feature then. Previously with 4 & 5 it was for NT only... | Just for the record, this is not correct. CF 5 (and 4.5 too I believe) runs on Linux/Apache, Solaris, AIX, SuSe, and more.
|

October 2nd, 2003, 09:45 AM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by kiteless
Just for the record, this is not correct. CF 5 (and 4.5 too I believe) runs on Linux/Apache, Solaris, AIX, SuSe, and more. |
Good to know. Thanks for the knowledge, kiteless. My first experience w/ CFML has been the MX version.
|

October 2nd, 2003, 12:54 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MOV @R1, P1 ; RAM (40H) <= OCAH
Posts: 18
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 0
|
|
kiteless don't forget HP-UX !
BTW and FYI all together .. that list drgroove suplied it's only the officially supported os's list !
many users hv cfmx successfully instaled on os's that aren't listed in the MM website.
Brandon Harper for ex successfully instaled cfmx in freebsd 5.1, you can actually find an installation breef here
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lis...21081&forumid=4
http://webforums.macromedia.com/col...threadid=430738
and shots here
http://booms.net/gallery/CFMXonFreeBSD
And i also almost managed to put qnx + tomcat and cfmx to run, however always failed in the end .. never tried hard though .. i believe with a litle work, every OS that is able to run a jvm, cfmx will run on it.
even Mac OS support started out with a 'hack' like this ..
the same applies with database support, with the database has an odbc or jdbc driver, cfmx is able to connect to it.
regards,
idss
Last edited by neus : October 2nd, 2003 at 01:02 PM.
|
Developer Shed Advertisers and Affiliates
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|