#1
  1. Did you steal it?
    Devshed Supreme Being (6500+ posts)

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Washington, USA
    Posts
    13,997
    Rep Power
    9397

    AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800 -vs- Athlon 64 4000


    Which one would be "better" in the most basic definition?

    I'm either:
    - On the web + running a F@H client + listening to music (local or streamed) + other miscellaneous things, or
    - Playing games (99% of the time either FEAR or Halo 1/2) - I've paused F@H and stopped most everything else I have running

    PS: I have two nVidia 6600 GT cards running one LCD in SLi mode

    PPS: I don't want to overclock

    [edit] Heh, it's a regular 64 4000 instead, not an FX
    Last edited by requinix; August 13th, 2007 at 04:47 PM.
  2. #2
  3. Lord of the Dance
    Devshed Expert (3500 - 3999 posts)

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    3,612
    Rep Power
    1945
    not much info about the FX-series, but would guess it is better by design than the X2

    for yours need the X2 should be good enough, especially for the games you posted, and isn't that expensive compared to FX.

    just be sure about correct sockets between cpu and motherboard
    Last edited by MrFujin; August 14th, 2007 at 07:34 AM.
  4. #3
  5. Just another guy
    Devshed Frequenter (2500 - 2999 posts)

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,953
    Rep Power
    262
    Which core do each of the cpus have? The 4000+ can have either the San Diego or Clawhammer core (San Diego is faster), and the 3800+ x2 can have either the Windsor or the Toledo core (Windsor is faster and uses faster ram).

    Either way, the 3800+ x2 is superior. The single thread performance is equal or better than the 4000+, and multitasking is no contest.
    --Dave--

    U2kgSG9jIExlZ2VyZSBTY2lzLCBOaW1pdW0gRXJ1ZGl0aW9uaXMgSGFiZXM=

    My hobby: collecting US coins
  6. #4
  7. No Profile Picture
    Registered User
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11
    Rep Power
    0
    X2 is newer than FX, so IMHO I would prefer X2.
  8. #5
  9. No Profile Picture
    Registered User
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    11
    Rep Power
    0

    Smile


    I have a AMD 3800 64 X2 Energy Efficient 65w chip and I am very happy with its performance. I know you said you did not want to OC but if you did, the 3800 OC'ed very nicely for me.
  10. #6
  11. No Profile Picture
    Registered User
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    india
    Posts
    65
    Rep Power
    0
    i too use AMD x2 3800 its working fine i play big offline games never gives up..

IMN logo majestic logo threadwatch logo seochat tools logo