#1
  1. No Profile Picture
    Registered User
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1
    Rep Power
    0

    Xeon or Dual Core


    Hi, I have a dual Xeon 2.2g Processor system. im looking for a change. Now is Dual Core as fast as a dual Xeon processor. A lot of people have told me to stick to xeon. The dual xeon has hyp-thread tech, but the dual cores don't?

    Not sure what the difference would be.
  2. #2
  3. Trapped on the forums...help
    Devshed Demi-God (4500 - 4999 posts)

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    /Users/edman007
    Posts
    4,617
    Rep Power
    905
    to get are your real question, a dual Xeon system will probably be faster then a dual core system in most cases because the Xeon system has more FSB bandwidth to use (dual core basically has two complete CPUs in one package, it allows them to be optimized to better work together [so in some things dual core is better] and saves money, but they generally have less FSB bandwidth per core), but the woodcrest based Xeons are dual core anyways, right now the high end model of every CPU is pretty much at least dual core

    if i were you i would buy the dual-dual core [4 core] Xeon (5100 series), Apple Sells one for $2500 (dual-dual core 2.66 Xeon) and I'm sure you could get it cheaper if you build it your self, also the 5100 series Xeon have a much better architecture so a 2.66 GHz 5100 Xeon is much much faster then the 3 GHz Xeon with hyperthreading, and you have twice as many cores (they also have a 3GHz 5100 Xeon which is pretty much the fastest thing you can get)

    BTW, hyperthreading only gives you a very small speed increase, where adding an extra core almost doubles the processing power
  4. #3
  5. No Profile Picture
    Contributing User
    Devshed Novice (500 - 999 posts)

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    841
    Rep Power
    1682
    If I understand your question correctly, here's a better way of phrasing it:
    Is a dual server-oriented Pentium 4 processor faster than a desktop-oriented dual Core2 (Conroe) processor?
    If that's the case, then in most cases the answer will be yes. While P4-Xeons due have a bandwidth advantage, don't neglects to take into account the advanced prefetching logic ("Memory Disambiguation") which helps narrow the gap. You'll also notice that additional cache usually only helps significantly in server settings, rather than desktop ones, so most enthusiastic don't see a big performance gain. Depending on your Xeon, the Core2 Duo's cache may be larger.

    Intel's implementation of HyperThreading (SMT) is unfortunately not inspiring and mostly serves to build up valuable organizational knowledge. It adds only a minor performance boost, and hardly makes up for the numerous limitations of the Pentium4 (NetBurst) architecture. You'll find that a Core2 processor will out perform a Xeon, clock for clock, in single-threaded applications.

    If you purchase a Woodcrest Xeon, which is a Xeon based on the Core2 micro-architecture, then you'll have the best available. However most of the advantages of a server platform don't transfer well to home use, so I'd caution the investment. You may also wish to wait for the quad-core Xeons to be released later this year, which will coincide with a refresh of the Core2 line-up and price reductions. Regardless, a little Googling and you can find some benchmarks to see whether the performance/$ is worth it.
  6. #4
  7. No Profile Picture
    Contributing User
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    91
    Rep Power
    10
    I would stick with the Xeon's. If you want a change just upgrade them to a higher speed

IMN logo majestic logo threadwatch logo seochat tools logo