|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh, the irony...
Mozilla.org's website causes Netscape 4.7x to crash completely, in both Win2K and Solaris 9.
So, in theory, if I were a Netscape 4.x user, and wanted to upgrade to Mozilla, I wouldn't be able to... Just amazing
__________________
Give a person code, and they'll hack for a day; Teach them how to code, and they'll hack forever. Analyze twice; hack once. The world's first existential ITIL question: If a change is released into production without a ticket to track it, was it actually released? About DrGroove: ITIL-Certified IT Process Engineer - Enterprise Application Architect - Freelance IT Journalist - Devshed Moderator - Funk Bassist Extraordinaire |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
haha.
i know everyone is going to hate me, but i wish somehow someway, the w3c adoped ie's dom model. to me it makes more sense. oh no...here it comes... |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Hu - we as developers want our dom applications to actually work, so that is not an option. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
im just saying that their DOM model is a lot easier and intuitive to me, so i wish that w3c had implemented that instead of their retarded box model
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I can't say I disagree w/ sad.machine on that one... MS' DOM is a bit more intuitive than the W3C's.
But, its better to have one standard that is a little b0rked, that everyone agrees on and uses, than have two or three models, each with varying +'s and -'s... |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
i totally agree.
|
![]() |
| Viewing: Dev Shed Forums > Other > Dev Shed Lounge > Oh, the irony... |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|