Dev Shed Lounge
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   Dev Shed ForumsOtherDev Shed Lounge

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread Dev Shed Forums Sponsor:
  #1  
Old April 16th, 2003, 04:42 PM
viz viz is offline
::::
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 64 viz User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 6
The 'Fox Effect' on TV, the "Dopey Old U.N.," and an End to Real News?

Quote:
"Our paradigm now seems to be: something terrible happened to us on September 11, and that gives us the right to interpret all future events in a way that everyone else in the world must agree with us. And if they don't, they can go straight to hell."

-- Bill Clinton
News: Clinton blasts US approach to international affairs (15 Apr 03)
Quote:
After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, though, Fox News Channel covered the fighting in Afghanistan with heavy patriotism, referring to "our troops" who were fighting "terror goons." Fox jumped to first in the cable news ratings in January 2002.

The channel has now taken its brand of pro-American journalism to a new level. One recent night, a correspondent in Iraq referred to war protesters as "the great unwashed."

After the first statue of Saddam Hussein fell in Baghdad, Neal Cavuto, an anchor, delivered a message to those "who opposed the liberation of Iraq": "You were sickening then, you are sickening now." Another Fox anchor, John Gibson, said he hoped Iraq's reconstruction would not be left to "the dopey old U.N."
Opinion: Cable's War Coverage Suggests a New 'Fox Effect' on Television (16 Apr 03)

Will the future of U.S. journalism and politics lie in sucking up to American flag-wavers? What do you think?
__________________
Disclaimer: content may have handled during settling.
::::::::::::::
regards, viz

Last edited by viz : April 16th, 2003 at 04:49 PM.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 16th, 2003, 08:05 PM
thedude thedude is offline
The Dude Abides
Dev Shed Beginner (1000 - 1499 posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: grass valley,ca
Posts: 1,063 thedude User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 9 h 4 m 29 sec
Reputation Power: 10
Mmmm, Clinton shouldn't criticize what he didn't have. He was too busy chasing tail, lying, dodging sexual harassment suits, and trying to avoid prosecution for his wife's business dealings. He did absolutely nothing productive as president. His presidency was a black eye to this nation that hasn't been seen since Nixon. He should be forgotten.

As for the news, you are correct. I think Fox News may be trying to counter how CNN reports things. I was watching CNN for everything, but they only focused on the bad side of everything. I want non-biased reporting, but I would also like to see stories that cover all aspects.

Fox, while it is a little more biased towards the US, shows good, bad and indifferent.
__________________
The Dude
I'm the Dude. So that's what you call me.
That, or Duder, His Dudeness, Or El Duderino.
If, you know, you're not into the whole brevity thing

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 16th, 2003, 11:37 PM
MJEggertson MJEggertson is offline
Contributing User
Dev Shed Novice (500 - 999 posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 863 MJEggertson User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)MJEggertson User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)MJEggertson User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)MJEggertson User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 22 sec
Reputation Power: 8
Clinton has as much a right to criticize as any person, whether they be an American or not, a taxpayer or not, or an ex-president or not. Infact, I applaud his statements: it that's how he feels, it's impressive he said it in a public forum. Seems no one is allowed to say such things without taking alot of flak from the American public, and taking equal amouts of PR damage. To me, it's refreshing, regardless of one's stance on the war, to hear an opinion like that from a public figure.

Anyways, I know better than to step into a political discussion, so that's about all I have to say.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 17th, 2003, 12:28 AM
jpenn's Avatar
jpenn jpenn is offline
Contributing User
Dev Shed Frequenter (2500 - 2999 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,693 jpenn User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)jpenn User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)jpenn User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)jpenn User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)jpenn User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 5 h 41 m 10 sec
Reputation Power: 16
He has to say that because the 2004 election propaganda engine is getting ready to fire up - if he says anything different, that would mean he is not backing his own party...
__________________
~ Joe Penn

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 22nd, 2003, 03:53 AM
TechNoFear TechNoFear is offline
Offensive Member
Dev Shed Novice (500 - 999 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: in the perfect world
Posts: 594 TechNoFear User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)TechNoFear User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)TechNoFear User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)TechNoFear User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)TechNoFear User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 Days 14 h 6 m 15 sec
Reputation Power: 21
The victors always write the history.

The US media giants have become such cross promotional multinational corporations that the truth is unimportant (in a world where GM supplies porn). Spin is necessary and facts become malleable.

What is important is profit for the shareholders.

Question is, who are the majority shareholders?

Usually the same people who are saying their right to a profit overrides the corporations social responsibility. They give generously to political funds and get better representation and in some cases preferential treatment (ie Enron).

Who can get elected if the media suddenly stops reporting good things about them?

>>I applaud his statements: it that's how he feels, it's impressive he said it in a public forum. Seems no one is allowed to say such things without taking alot of flak from the American public<<

I agree. Would he have said them while he had a chance at political office? No, so this will get him back in the spotlight, earn him brownie points for his party and another round of speaches at >$100K a pop.

Its all about timing.......



This site has some quotes from the mainstream US media on the UNSCOM inspectors. Interesting how the media changes view to support its current stand and not the TRUTH.


http://www.fair.org/extra/0210/inspectors.html
__________________
The essence of Christianity is told us in the Garden of Eden history. The fruit that was forbidden was on the Tree of Knowledge. The subtext is, All the suffering you have is because you wanted to find out what was going on. You could be in the Garden of Eden if you had just kept your f***ing mouth shut and hadn't asked any questions.

Frank Zappa

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: Dev Shed ForumsOtherDev Shed Lounge > The 'Fox Effect' on TV, the "Dopey Old U.N.," and an End to Real News?


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump


Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 





© 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 5 hosted by Hostway