Dev Shed Lounge
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   Dev Shed ForumsOtherDev Shed Lounge

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread Dev Shed Forums Sponsor:
Get inside! Sample the range of functionality easily built with JMSL Library for Time Series Data Analysis, Heat Maps, Portfolio Optimization, Monte Carlo Simulation, Stock Price Charting and more. Download Now!
  #1  
Old January 3rd, 2003, 11:58 PM
aostrow aostrow is offline
Junior Member
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 2 aostrow User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Send a message via AIM to aostrow
The Proper Path for Nanotechnology

Hey All,
Im a new member at DevShed Forums, but thought it would be a great place to get some feedback about an article I have just published about nanotechnology. The article discusses the basics of the technology for those who might be unfamiliar with it, and also weights the pros and cons of its development, with my own analysis included. If you have a few minutes and would like to check out the article, its at:

URL

Also, if you have opinions regarding the topic, please post! I did a lot of research on the issue and am interested as to what the popular opinion is about it, especially in the tech community.

Thanks!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 4th, 2003, 12:21 AM
Ctb's Avatar
Ctb Ctb is offline
An Ominous Coward
Dev Shed Specialist (4000 - 4499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,425 Ctb User rank is Colonel (50000 - 60000 Reputation Level)Ctb User rank is Colonel (50000 - 60000 Reputation Level)Ctb User rank is Colonel (50000 - 60000 Reputation Level)Ctb User rank is Colonel (50000 - 60000 Reputation Level)Ctb User rank is Colonel (50000 - 60000 Reputation Level)Ctb User rank is Colonel (50000 - 60000 Reputation Level)Ctb User rank is Colonel (50000 - 60000 Reputation Level)Ctb User rank is Colonel (50000 - 60000 Reputation Level)Ctb User rank is Colonel (50000 - 60000 Reputation Level)Ctb User rank is Colonel (50000 - 60000 Reputation Level)Ctb User rank is Colonel (50000 - 60000 Reputation Level)Ctb User rank is Colonel (50000 - 60000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 10 h
Reputation Power: 0
Good article - interesting, informative, all that stuff they taught us about in journalism

However, I fear that nanotech in the U.S. will either go the way of cloning: i.e. succumb to the "yuck factor" because of irrational responses from a poorly informed public, or the way of the WWW, commercialized and exploited to death for the personal gains of greedy business people. I think we should look forward to nanotech expanding in countries that have shown themselves capable of handling new technologies with some sort of clue... not like we do here in the U.S. Could you see it now? A whole new DMCA section just for nanotech...

The other problem, beyond a technologically clueless governement, is the misinformed sheep-populace this country has somehow raised in the last generation or two. People in the U.S. have been whipped into a frothing mad frenzy over terrorism, despite no credible reason to be so frightened (after all.. the government failed to protect us on 9-11-01 and since then nothing's happened and nothing looks to be happening). Meaningless catch-phrases like "weapons of mass destruction", "evil doers", and "axis of evil" can be attached to anything to instantly make it seem evil and scary. The opponents will do this to nanotech when it become big enough, and as soon as the sheep-people hear it, they will pick up their outrage for a new target (the current target for generally baseless criticism is cloning, so we'll have to wait until they've killed that with their irrational zealotry).

I'd love to see nanotech flourish, and, I think out of the U.S. it probably will. But the sad fact is that our populace is too dumb and our government too bloated and greedy to let it happen. This is just the next big thing the rest of the world can kick our asses with...

And you're right about that wireless phone thing... man.. I can't get a damn signal in about 50% of my general area of movement... sad really.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 4th, 2003, 12:32 AM
aostrow aostrow is offline
Junior Member
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 2 aostrow User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Send a message via AIM to aostrow
Glad you enjoyed the article -- my first real crack at a major piece of writing not totally for school

I am also concerned about what our government response will be when nanotech is ready for prime time -- if the media and government haven't toned down the sensationalism by then (and the chances of that are very slim) it will definitely be the US losing out on all the benefits nanotech can bring.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: Dev Shed ForumsOtherDev Shed Lounge > The Proper Path for Nanotechnology


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump


Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 





© 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 1 hosted by Hostway