|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Using Dvorak Keyboards for Programming?
I am seriously considering remapping my keyboard to a Dvorak layout. (For those of you who don't know what this is, read this.) However, I do a lot of programming, scripting, and marking-up (mostly Perl, C++, and HTML). I found a "programmer version" of Dvorak here, but I'm still not sure if it's worth the effort to switch.
Any thoughts? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Intresting, I will have to take a look, and maybe try it.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
You know, it just dawned on me yesterday when looking at a new Clie PDA that QWERTY were the first row letters from left to right...
Never paid any attention...yeah yeah off topic, I know |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's disorienting at first... I can't tell if it would be faster or not because it's taken me a long time to quickly with the traditional QWERTY layout.
__________________
The Standards! CSS 2 - CSS 3 - w3c CSS Validator - XHTML 1.1 - HTML 4.01 - w3c (X)HTML Validator - ActionScript Reference Links! Bert's Door and Lock Service | Brandon Erik Bertelsen | TextPattern |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am used to the standard and would be slower on a non-standard keyboard.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
lol changing might be okay, but remapping means your letters would be the wrong places!!!
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, computer, that is the only problem I have had with the layout so far.
![]()
__________________
Baptism By The Scriptures | Fifty Objections to Baptism Answered | HTML Bible | God's Salvation Plan Lifetime Residual Income |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
well it suggests little stickers until you get a permanent solution, or remember it.
just get some scotch clear tape, write the letters with biro pen, put another layer on top, and hay presto |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
But most of the people geeky enough to want to try the Dvorak layout don't look at the keys when they type anyway . . .
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
no, not normally, but until you learn the layout, you need to look at the keys... unless you use trial and error
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Emacs has a dvorak keyboard layout module, and I hooked up one of my friends with it. He already types something like 125 wpm anyways, but wanted to go even faster
. Trouble is that the guy likes vi, so that put an end to our dvorak experiment.
__________________
Up the Irons What Would Jimi Do? Smash amps. Burn guitar. Take the groupies home. "Death Before Dishonour, my Friends!!" - Bruce D ickinson, Iron Maiden Aug 20, 2005 @ OzzFest Down with Sharon Osbourne Puzzle of the Month solved by Keath and KevinADC, superior perl programmers of the month |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Windows comes with a dvorak keyboard layout by default. Settings->Control Panel->Keyboard. Set it up as an alternate layout with alt+shift used to switch between layouts. It just will not be the "programmers Dvorak" that was mentioned earlier in this thread.
I personally couldn't do it. Touch typing is more a muscular reaction than a thought process (IMO). I don't think I could switch in and out of two different modes. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, it sounds like you either switch all the way or don't switch at all . . . that is, if I learned Dvorak, from day one I would never use Qwerty again.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree. All or nothing. Just out of curiosity, I have been playing with Dvorak just to see if I think I could do both. With time, it would probably be possible, but damn, it sure is hard.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|