|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
Dev Shed Forums Sponsor:
|
|
|
|
#16
March 4th, 2006, 11:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
CSS is (for the most part) a better tool for layout. Tables were used as a hack because CSS wasn't around since the begining. Now that it is around and supported by all major browsers there is no need to continue using tables.
Check out some CSS templates ** Frontpage 2003 doesn't suck. Frontpage 2002 and all previous versions suck, but 2003 is actually a decent editor. (I hate posting a M$ link, but in this case it is a good resource) Frontpage version comparison Comparison with Dreamweaver ** Quote:
Dreamweaver is fantastic, for a certain type of use. There are many situations in which a better tool will get the job done better. For professional rapid development of small sites Dreamweaver is by far the best thing out there.
|
|
#17
March 4th, 2006, 08:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I use Dev-PHP. Open source, lightweight, simple. Supports HTML, CSS, Javascript and PHP very well.
__________________
The best book on programming for the layman is Alice in Wonderland; but that's because it's the best book on anything for the layman. ~ Alan J. Perlis
|
|
#18
March 5th, 2006, 03:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Alrighty, I have my question answered now.
__________________
"Friendship is like peeing your pants. Everybody can see it but only you can feel the warmth." ----------------------------- Free Online Dog Simulation Game: http://www.dogrealm.net
|
|
| Viewing: Dev Shed Forums > Web Site Management > Development Software > Is Dreamweaver really the best? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
