DNS
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   Dev Shed ForumsSystem AdministrationDNS

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread Dev Shed Forums Sponsor:
SlickEdit: Code in over 40 languages across 7 platforms. SlickEdit’s unmatched power, speed, and flexibility allows even the most accomplished developers to write better code faster. Download a free trial today!
  #1  
Old February 19th, 2004, 04:55 PM
skiloup skiloup is offline
Registered User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 15 skiloup User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Send a message via ICQ to skiloup
Question Problems making my DNS resolve my new domain

First off, I'm a Computer Engineering major trying to learn the whole process of running a functional website for fun.

I have Red Hat 9 installed on a spare computer that will be the nameserver for my new domain. I'll list my setup as I have it now.

I have a static IP assigned by my ISP, 24.53.231.244. I run this connection through a Coyote Linux Router. The router forwards requests on TCP/UDP 53 to my Red Hat 9 machine which is named 'server'. The ip of 'server' is internal and is 192.168.0.246. Right now 'server' will resolve names fine. eg. If I assign my DNS server as 192.168.0.246 on another machine (also internal) I can browse the internet and everything fine. I have registered ocranch.us and registered my nameservers with my domain registrar as ns1.ocranch.us and ns2.ocranch.us both pointing to 24.53.231.244 (i know this sucks but I'm a student w/o the $$$).

Here the files that named is using:
**** /etc/named.conf ****

Code:
controls {
        inet 127.0.0.1 allow { localhost; } keys { rndckey; };
};
 
include "/etc/named.custom";
include "/etc/rndc.key";

zone  "0.0.127.in-addr.arpa" { 
	type master; 
	file  "0.0.127.in-addr.arpa.zone"; 
};
zone  "231.53.24.in-addr.arpa" { 
	type master; 
	file  "231.53.24.in-addr.arpa.zone"; 
};
zone  "localhost" { 
	type master; 
	file  "localhost.zone"; 
};
zone  "ocranch.us" { 
	type master; 
	file  "ocranch.us.zone"; 
};


**** /var/named/ocranch.us.zone ****
Code:
$TTL 86400
@	IN	SOA	ns1  root.ocranch.us (
			5 ; serial
			28800 ; refresh
			7200 ; retry
			604800 ; expire	
			86400 ; ttl
			)
		NS	ns1
		NS	ns2
		A	24.53.231.244
ns1		A	24.53.231.244
ns2		A	24.53.231.244
www		A	24.53.231.244


**** /var/named/0.0.127.in-addr.arpa.zone ****
Code:
$TTL 86400
@	IN	SOA	ns1	root.ocranch.us (
			1 ; serial
			28800 ; refresh
			7200 ; retry
			604800 ; expire	
			86400 ; ttk
			)
		NS	ns1.ocranch.us.
		NS	ns2.ocranch.us.

1	IN	PTR	ns1.ocranch.us.

**** /var/named/231.53.24.in-addr.arpa.zone ****
Code:
$TTL 86400
@	IN	SOA	ns1 root.ocranch.us (
			7 ; serial
			28800 ; refresh
			7200 ; retry
			604800 ; expire	
			86400 ; ttk
			)
		NS	ns1
		NS	ns2
		A	24.53.231.244
;Server
244	IN	PTR	NS1.ocranch.us.


I've been searching the internet high and low and this is the implementation I attempted and as you can tell it isn't working. Any help would be GREATLY apprectiated! After I get this project figured out, I plan to learn how to run a functional mail server with pop3,imap,smtp, and webmail features. If you have any suggestions where to start I'd love to hear them.

Thanks again, your time and efforts truly are appreciated.
-skiloup

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 19th, 2004, 05:54 PM
SilentRage's Avatar
SilentRage SilentRage is offline
DNS/BIND Guru
Dev Shed Specialist (4000 - 4499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: OH, USA
Posts: 4,193 SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Week 5 Days 14 h 27 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 77
It appears you are not allowing UDP port 53 through your redhat and/or router firewall.

Timed out
ns1.ocranch.us UDP request

Succeeded
ns1.ocranch.us TCP request
__________________
Send me a private message if you would like me to setup your DNS for you for a price of your choosing. This is the preferred method if your DNS needs to be fixed/setup fast and you don't have the time to bounce messages back and forth on a forum. Also, check out these links:

Whois Direct | DNS Crawler | NS Trace | Compare Free DNS Hosts

Last edited by SilentRage : April 20th, 2004 at 09:28 PM.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 20th, 2004, 02:44 AM
skiloup skiloup is offline
Registered User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 15 skiloup User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Send a message via ICQ to skiloup
Unhappy Any other explanation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SilentRage
It appears you are not allowing UDP port 53 through your redhat and/or router firewall.

Timed out
ns1.ocranch.us UDP request

Succeeded
ns1.ocranch.us TCP request


I followed all the instructions to allow UDP 53 through the router firewall and through redhat's firewall and still got a TIMED OUT response from your above DNS Crawler. I'm having a hard time testing if each (the router firewall and redhats) is allowing UDP 53 requests. Does it appear as though my setup should work from my previous post? Might my ISP be dropping my incoming UDP requests? Is there any simple way to 'unit test' each machine to see if my requests are being blocked or not?

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 20th, 2004, 07:30 AM
SilentRage's Avatar
SilentRage SilentRage is offline
DNS/BIND Guru
Dev Shed Specialist (4000 - 4499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: OH, USA
Posts: 4,193 SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Week 5 Days 14 h 27 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 77
heh, you're tickling my imagination, but sure, I figured out a way to test if your ISP is blocking UDP ports. Also, there's a small possability that your DNS server is failing to respond to UDP packets, but not TCP requests. So we need to eliminate that possability too.

Below is a UDP DNS request sent to my computer via port 54.

resolver.dollardns.net UDP port 54

As you can see DNS Crawler notifies you that it recieved a "Port Unreachable" ICMP response (did ya learn what those are in engineering classes? ). If you open YOUR port 54 and forward it to a machine and make sure it passes through all firewalls, then you can attempt to send a request to that port to see if a unreachable occurs. If you do get the unreachable then the request was a success and UDP port 53 MAY be blocked by your ISP, if you continue to get timeouts, then something is wrong with your firewall configuration on redhat most likely. Routers are easier to configure, so it's not likely to be that.

So that's the test for ISP blockage. Now for a test to see if it is a DNS server failure. Do the following command at your DNS server and show me the response.

dig @ns1.ocranch.us ocranch.us any

Last edited by SilentRage : April 20th, 2004 at 09:29 PM.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old February 20th, 2004, 01:52 PM
skiloup skiloup is offline
Registered User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 15 skiloup User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Send a message via ICQ to skiloup
First off, I want to thank you, SilentRage, for spending the time to help all of us out!

Okay, so I forwarded udp 54 through my router to my redhat machine and told it to accept udp 54 requests using:
iptables -I INPUT 1 -p udp -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d 192.168.0.246 port 53 -j ACCEPT

Then using the last link you gave me to your Crawler I did this:
Server: ns1.ocranch.us:54
Name: test.com

And it says: "Port Unreachable", if I leave the :54 off it Times Out
From your previous response this made me think that maybe my ISP is blocking UDP 53.

I continued to do what you asked using 'dig @ns1.ocranch.us any' and the following code segment is what I got. Note: On my redhat machine (the one I'm running this dig on) I have set the primary and secondary DNS to those of my ISP.
Code:
[root@server root]# dig @ns1.ocranch.us any
 
; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> @ns1.ocranch.us any
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 45676
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 13, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 13
 
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;.                              IN      NS
 
;; ANSWER SECTION:
.                       511804  IN      NS      K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
.                       511804  IN      NS      L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
.                       511804  IN      NS      M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
.                       511804  IN      NS      A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
.                       511804  IN      NS      B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
.                       511804  IN      NS      C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
.                       511804  IN      NS      D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
.                       511804  IN      NS      E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
.                       511804  IN      NS      F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
.                       511804  IN      NS      G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
.                       511804  IN      NS      H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
.                       511804  IN      NS      I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
.                       511804  IN      NS      J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
 
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       198.41.0.4
B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       192.228.79.201
C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       192.33.4.12
D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       128.8.10.90
E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       192.203.230.10
F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       192.5.5.241
G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       192.112.36.4
H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       128.63.2.53
I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       192.36.148.17
J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       192.58.128.30
K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       193.0.14.129
L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       198.32.64.12
M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     598204  IN      A       202.12.27.33
 
;; Query time: 1436 msec
;; SERVER: 24.53.231.244#53(ns1.ocranch.us)
;; WHEN: Fri Feb 20 11:08:34 2004
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 436


Quote:
..."Port Unreachable" ICMP response (did ya learn what those are in engineering classes?)...

Haha, and no. I feel more like an electrical engineer than a computer engineer right now. Lots of using differential equations.

Thanks again for:
1) Your time
2) Your help and willingness to help
3) Your patience
I know some days you've gotta feel like people are complete idiots!

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old February 20th, 2004, 05:38 PM
SilentRage's Avatar
SilentRage SilentRage is offline
DNS/BIND Guru
Dev Shed Specialist (4000 - 4499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: OH, USA
Posts: 4,193 SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Week 5 Days 14 h 27 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 77
Well since you proved quite competent setting up forwarding for UDP port 54, then I feel you must've done it right with 53. The only other conclusion is that your ISP is blocking 53. Contact your ISP and confirm this. If indeed they are blocking port 53, then you cannot host your own dns server. There are no work-arounds.

For testing purposes you may use any of these free domain hosting services. DollarDNS hosting configuration is fairly similar to setting up zones using BIND.

http://www.dollardns.net/compare.html

And as for idiots, I only start thinking of a person as an idiot if I describe to them how to get things setup and they still don't understand. It insults my teaching ability too.

Last edited by SilentRage : April 20th, 2004 at 09:29 PM.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old February 21st, 2004, 02:22 AM
skiloup skiloup is offline
Registered User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 15 skiloup User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Send a message via ICQ to skiloup
Ok... So I called my ISP and the tech said they only block tcp 80 25 110. I don't really know what else to try. I ran a port scanning utility from the University and it confirmed that tcp 80 was blocked, but more importantly showed that tcp/udp 53 were NOT. I must be overlooking something obvious. I think that I am goint to try BIND on WinXp and see what happens there. Can I copy the files above straight over? I'll have to look into it a little bit. Even though I hope everything works once I get it installed on Xp, my ultimate goal is to get it running on the RedHat machine because I could run NAT routing, DNS, web, sql, ftp, mail... all from the on machine (FOR FREE). I realize this isn't the ideal setup, but I figure its a start, and I'm not actually RELYING on the services.

FOR NOW, I don't need to get ahead of myself. The task at hand is making my DNS work properly. So to recap;
  • I have purchased ocranch.us
  • I have registered ns1.ocranch.us and ns2.ocranch.us each with the same ip (24.53.231.244)
  • According to my isp and my port scans tcp & udp 53 ARE open
  • My DNS configuration files are correct (Honestly not too confident about this)

Also interesting I have registered ns1.usranch.us as my nameserver through my GoDaddy, well since that machine is internal it has the same address as my webserver. My ISP is blocking port 80 so if you go to http://ns1.ocranch.us:69 you will get my webserver. Anyhow, I want to do this right. Should I just go ahead and try the setup of Bind on WinXp, then get back to asking questions depending on how that works? Or do you think it'd be better to try and work through my problems setting it up on RedHat? I realize this isn't really a DNS question so I'll try and get it up on WinXp over the next week. If you think of any suggestions, please send them over. You can always IM me on ICQ as well.
Thanks again!

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old February 21st, 2004, 03:11 AM
SilentRage's Avatar
SilentRage SilentRage is offline
DNS/BIND Guru
Dev Shed Specialist (4000 - 4499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: OH, USA
Posts: 4,193 SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Week 5 Days 14 h 27 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 77
* SilentRage starts cracking his knuckles threateningly

I definately want to see this problem kicked with redhat. So let's test again. I just noticed that you did the wrong command when digging your server. I told you to do this:

dig @ns1.ocranch.us ocranch.us any

And instead you did this:

dig @ns1.ocranch.us any

But now I want you to do this:

dig @24.53.231.244 ocranch.us any

paste for me the results.

Also I want to know how you know port UDP 53 was open when you scanned it from the university. Did you do a UDP scan or something and got something back? Or did you accidentally mean you scanned TCP port 53 and found it open? (which I had already confirmed)

And sorry, I don't use instant messengers. I just IRC.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old February 21st, 2004, 01:54 PM
skiloup skiloup is offline
Registered User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 15 skiloup User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Send a message via ICQ to skiloup
Results from 'dig @24.53.231.244 ocranch.us any' :
Code:
[root@server root]# dig @24.53.231.244 ocranch.us any
 
; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> @24.53.231.244 ocranch.us any
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 13644
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 2
 
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;ocranch.us.                    IN      ANY
 
;; ANSWER SECTION:
ocranch.us.             86400   IN      SOA     ns1.ocranch.us. admin.ocranch.us. 5 28800 7200 604800 86400
ocranch.us.             86400   IN      NS      ns1.ocranch.us.
ocranch.us.             86400   IN      NS      ns2.ocranch.us.
ocranch.us.             86400   IN      A       24.53.231.244
 
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns1.ocranch.us.         86400   IN      A       24.53.231.244
ns2.ocranch.us.         86400   IN      A       24.53.231.244
 
;; Query time: 785 msec
;; SERVER: 24.53.231.244#53(24.53.231.244)
;; WHEN: Sat Feb 21 10:50:39 2004
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 154


NOTE: I just made a small changed to the zone files before this dig. For the old email address I had 'root.ocranch.us' which meant 'root.ocranch.us.ocranch.us' so i just changed it to 'admin'

Heres how I could tell that udp 53 was open. I downloaded a piece of software from glocksoft.com called AATools (Advanced Administrative Tools). In AATools they have a port scanner and I scanned for all TCP and UDP open ports. The results I got back match up with the ports I am forwarding through my router's firewall, which included udp 53 and tcp 53.

I wonder if someone outside my network set their DNS as 24.53.231.244 if they would be able to resolve any names?

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old February 21st, 2004, 02:34 PM
SilentRage's Avatar
SilentRage SilentRage is offline
DNS/BIND Guru
Dev Shed Specialist (4000 - 4499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: OH, USA
Posts: 4,193 SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Week 5 Days 14 h 27 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 77
I want you to try the same dig command from the university. Also, is your ISP/IP related in any way to the university? Like, maybe they're on the same subnet or something?

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old February 21st, 2004, 03:58 PM
skiloup skiloup is offline
Registered User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 15 skiloup User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Send a message via ICQ to skiloup
The ISP and the university are in no way related (completely different backbone). When I run the 'dig @24.53.231.244 ocranch.us any' from the university I get:
; <<>> DiG 9.1.3 <<>> @24.53.231.244 ocranch.us any
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached;

I did this by ssh-ing into a unix shell on campus then running the command.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old February 21st, 2004, 05:07 PM
SilentRage's Avatar
SilentRage SilentRage is offline
DNS/BIND Guru
Dev Shed Specialist (4000 - 4499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: OH, USA
Posts: 4,193 SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)SilentRage User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Week 5 Days 14 h 27 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 77
Alrighty, shut down the dns server. Then start it manually like this:

named -u named -g

show me the response. This is to determine if there are any warnings or errors when the server starts up.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old February 21st, 2004, 05:42 PM
skiloup skiloup is offline
Registered User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 15 skiloup User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Send a message via ICQ to skiloup
Very interesting. I shut it down using the Service Configuration panel, then start it up with the command you gave me and this is what I get:
Code:
[root@server root]# named -u named -g
Feb 21 15:34:55.758 starting BIND 9.2.1 -u named -g
Feb 21 15:34:55.761 using 1 CPU
Feb 21 15:34:56.551 loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf'
Feb 21 15:34:57.062 no IPv6 interfaces found
Feb 21 15:34:57.064 listening on IPv4 interface lo, 127.0.0.1#53
Feb 21 15:34:57.469 listening on IPv4 interface eth1, 192.168.0.246#53
Feb 21 15:34:57.889 command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
Feb 21 15:34:57.890 ignoring config file logging statement due to -g option
Feb 21 15:34:58.316 zone 0.0.127.in-addr.arpa/IN: loaded serial 1
Feb 21 15:34:58.326 zone 231.53.24.in-addr.arpa/IN: loaded serial 7
Feb 21 15:34:59.089 zone localhost/IN: loaded serial 1
Feb 21 15:34:59.099 zone ocranch.us/IN: loaded serial 5
Feb 21 15:34:59.894 running
Feb 21 15:34:59.896 zone 0.0.127.in-addr.arpa/IN: sending notifies (serial 1)
Feb 21 15:35:00.318 zone 231.53.24.in-addr.arpa/IN: sending notifies (serial 7)
Feb 21 15:35:00.320 zone ocranch.us/IN: sending notifies (serial 5)
 

And it appears to just hang there. If I <ctrl+c> to break out it shuts named down. But if I look in the Service Configuration panel while it is hung up, it shows everything started and is running fine. Is how it's supposed to be?