DNS
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   Dev Shed ForumsSystem AdministrationDNS

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread Dev Shed Forums Sponsor:
Stay one step ahead of the competition. Evaluate and give feedback on some of the hottest web development tools on the market today. Make your opinion heard! Click Here
  #1  
Old April 14th, 2008, 03:53 AM
forester404 forester404 is offline
Registered User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2 forester404 User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 23 m 37 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Zone transfers and recursive name servers

Hi.
I am using Bind as a name server for domain1, that delegates
sub domain sub1.domain1, on some other name server.
this works fine when I am trying to resolve A and SRV records
, so when I test it and trying to resolve them from the parent
domain name server, the Bind (the parent domain NS) behaves as a recursive name server, resolves the records from it's subdomain's server, and returns them to the resolver.
However, when I am trying to request a zone transfer from that
same subdomain, i get a 'Not authoritative' reply from the bind.
When i send the request directly to the delegated name server
of the subdomain, the zone transfer works fine.
I don't understand this behaviour, I mean, why does Bind
behaves as a recursive name server for A and SRV records of
a certain subdomain, but will return 'Not authoritative' for
zone transfer of the same subdomain ?
Any explanations would be appreciated.
Thnx.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 1st, 2008, 10:45 PM
fishtoprecords's Avatar
fishtoprecords fishtoprecords is offline
Contributing User
Dev Shed Novice (500 - 999 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: outside Washington DC
Posts: 610 fishtoprecords User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)fishtoprecords User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)fishtoprecords User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)fishtoprecords User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)fishtoprecords User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)fishtoprecords User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)fishtoprecords User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)fishtoprecords User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 5 Days 15 h 24 m 48 sec
Reputation Power: 177
generally you setup an ACL, like:

acl "xfer" { 70.184.242.242; 192.168.1.1;
};


and then provide

allow-transfer { xfer;};
in your named.conf.local

Then the other DNS, the one slaved to your master has to have lines like:

zone "foobaz.com" {
type slave;
file "/var/named/foobaz.com.zone";
masters { 10.1.167.76; };
};

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: Dev Shed ForumsSystem AdministrationDNS > Zone transfers and recursive name servers


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump

 Free IT White Papers!
 
Accelerating Trading Partner Performance
One in five. That's how many partner transactions have at least one error. That is an amazing statistic, particularly given the extraordinary leaps in innovation across the global supply chain during the past two decades. Download this white paper to learn more.

 
Competing on Analytics
This Tech Analysis is designed to help identify characteristics shared by analytics competitors, and includes information about 32 organizations that have made a commitment to quantitative, fact-based analysis.

 
Cost Effective Scaling with Virtualization and Coyote Point Systems
An overview of the industry trend toward virtualization, how server consolidation has increased the importance of application uptime and the steps being taken to integrate load balancing technology with virtualized servers.

 
Five Checkpoints to Implementing IP Telephony
Implementation planning for IP PBX software and IP telephony has become vital as businesses replace discontinued legacy PBX phone systems. This informative whitepaper outlines five "checkpoints" for any implementation plan that will help make IP communications a successful proposition.

 
Hosted Email Security: Staying Ahead of New Threats
In the last two years, email has become a fierce battleground between the nefarious forces of spam and malware, and the heroes of messaging protection. The spam volumes increased alarmingly every month, bringing clever new forms of phishing and virus propagation attacks.

 

Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 





© 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 5 hosted by Hostway