|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
Dev Shed Forums Sponsor:
|
|
|
|
#1
June 13th, 2003, 10:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Terminal Server/Linux legal Issues?
Getting M$ Terminal Server to work from RH9 is a snap, but what are the licencing issues? A friend of mine says it's impossible to obtain a cal for a linux client.... anyone dealt with this? Anyone using it?
__________________
Thanks, CF
|
|
#2
June 13th, 2003, 11:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Given that redhat is paranoid enough to not include the MP3 codecs because of HINTS of licensing issues, I suspect that they think it's OK to access terminal server. Don't you buy a certain number of concurrent connections, and isn't this enforced on the server? I'm not a real Windows Terminal Server expert, but I thought that was how it worked.
|
|
#3
June 13th, 2003, 11:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Out of the box, TS will track that stuff, but you can turn it off, and it won't bother you anymore. In fact, I have it turned off now. Still, I want to remain legal, as much as possible anyway.
|
|
| Viewing: Dev Shed Forums > Operating Systems > Linux Help > Terminal Server/Linux legal Issues? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
 |
|
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
