Page 1 of 2 12 Last
  • Jump to page:
    #1
  1. Contributing User
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Heemskerk, The Netherlands
    Posts
    254
    Rep Power
    13

    which windowmanager ??


    As a long time windowmaker user and my current switch to the gnome/sawfish combination (this evenening actually) I was wondering what windowmanager you use.

    Windowmaker ruled bigtime in it's stability and speed, but actually kinda looked like $#@% and sawfish is really fast, I didn't expect it actually and until now gnome seems to be quite stable (Unlike the slow kde) and it also looks pretty nice. I still have a lot to get used to , like missing the ALT #number combination to switch workspaces and all, I'll get used to it

    So, the question, which windowmanager do you use and why ??

    Marc van Duivenvoorde
  2. #2
  3. No Profile Picture
    YaBN (Yet another BSD Newbie)
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    74
    Rep Power
    13
    I use KDE because it's stable.
    -MattWil
  4. #3
  5. #4
  6. No Profile Picture
    Contributing User
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    May 2001
    Posts
    266
    Rep Power
    14

    Kde


    I used KDE up until a little while and now I use TWM because I only use the box as a router.

    KDE is very slow and runs slower than windows98 on my machine. But if you are a newbie its the way to go

    E.
  7. #5
  8. No Profile Picture
    Contributing User
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    oShaWa
    Posts
    52
    Rep Power
    13
    gnomenlightenment

    very nice lot of weight to it but not a problem with the thunderbird
  9. #6
  10. 11
    Devshed Demi-God (4500 - 4999 posts)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Lynn, MA
    Posts
    4,635
    Rep Power
    82

    Re: Kde


    Originally posted by Theeggman
    I used KDE up until a little while and now I use TWM because I only use the box as a router.

    If you only use the box as a router, why don't you just forget the gui altogether and boot to a console? All my linux boxes boot to a console first. You'd be a fool not to boot your servers to a console, I mean, how often do you actually interact with them beyond an ocassional ssh/rsync/scp session?

    There's a lot of times when I don't start x for hours on even my workstations, and having the gui boot each time annoys me.
  11. #7
  12. No Profile Picture
    Contributing User
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    May 2001
    Posts
    266
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Re: Kde


    Originally posted by Hero Zzyzzx


    If you only use the box as a router, why don't you just forget the gui altogether and boot to a console? All my linux boxes boot to a console first. You'd be a fool not to boot your servers to a console, I mean, how often do you actually interact with them beyond an ocassional ssh/rsync/scp session?

    There's a lot of times when I don't start x for hours on even my workstations, and having the gui boot each time annoys me.



    Because I don't want to????
  13. #8
  14. No Profile Picture
    Not there when you need me
    Devshed Beginner (1000 - 1499 posts)

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    1,430
    Rep Power
    14
  15. #9
  16. 11
    Devshed Demi-God (4500 - 4999 posts)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Lynn, MA
    Posts
    4,635
    Rep Power
    82

    Re: Re: Re: Kde


    Originally posted by Theeggman

    Because I don't want to????
    Fair enough. It's just kind of a waste of memory / processor clicks. It's definitely better to use a super lightweight WM like twm than the heavier ones.

    By the way, I use KDE when I use a desktop. I just think it's more useable than gnome. The newest koffice rocks, and I like the keyboard shortcuts in KDE better than gnome.

    I just feel more productive in KDE, though gnome is prettier.
  17. #10
  18. No Profile Picture
    Contributing User
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    oShaWa
    Posts
    52
    Rep Power
    13
    gnome is productive I have to opposite the kde is more guess it depends on how the person produces

    I set up the desktop for fast access to everything monitors whatever its
    just great and with the enlightenment blend adds even more

    does kde have eterm?
  19. #11
  20. No Profile Picture
    Not there when you need me
    Devshed Beginner (1000 - 1499 posts)

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    1,430
    Rep Power
    14
  21. #12
  22. No Profile Picture
    Contributing User
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    oShaWa
    Posts
    52
    Rep Power
    13
    I just brought up eterm cause for myself it makes it easy and fast using console
  23. #13
  24. No Profile Picture
    Roving Icicle
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Netizen
    Posts
    56
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Kde


    Originally posted by realnowhereman
    But what is the point of running any kind of UI on a router? You don't actually work on it (except via SSH etc., of course), do you?
    QaPla!

    Actually, why even use a standard distro for a router? Something like Smoothwall would work much better IMNSHO.

    Originally posted by Theeggman
    KDE is very slow and runs slower than windows98 on my machine. But if you are a newbie its the way to go
    Yeah, KDE is slower than Win98 on most systems, sadly. But I would argue KDE is less geared towards the newbie than GNOME. After all, you have to know enough to WANT KDE on most distros. I've used both, but I always end back with KDE.
    Is it just me or is it cold in here?
  25. #14
  26. Contributing User
    Devshed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Heemskerk, The Netherlands
    Posts
    254
    Rep Power
    13
    Actually, why even use a standard distro for a router? Something like Smoothwall would work much better IMNSHO.
    Because when you install a minimal standard system you have more control on what you want to do with the machine...right now I have mandrake single network firewall running because our company maybe want to use it as a replacement for nt/proxy for some of our clients, but as a firewall it's nice but not what I want. I do not have the control over the system the way I would like to have.....better get my cable (pppoe) running with freebsd and use that as a router with natd and ipfilter.

    btw, I couldn't get the cable running with Suse 7.2, which actually is my favo linux distro, a strong second is slackware, but for heavy duty servers and / or internet connected machines I almost only use freebsd, I don't exactly know why but somehow it seems to run faster, more stable and secure than linux boxes.

    Marc
  27. #15
  28. No Profile Picture
    Gödelian monster
    Devshed Regular (2000 - 2499 posts)

    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Central Florida, USA
    Posts
    2,307
    Rep Power
    61
    1. Amen to FreeBSD. It's not your imagination. Just browse the uptime reports at NetCraft

    2. Blackbox, Blackbox, Blackbox.
    It's a perfect GUI to run on a server (again, only run it when you need it...). On a reasonably fast Pentium III, I guarantee you will get Blackbox to start up in almost the same time as it takes to start up a bare X session ("xinit"). In other words, it's almost a zero impact window manager.

    And, on top of that, it looks darn cool. It uses only vectors and gradients, no bitmap rendering, but the range of themes you can get out of it are stunning. The menus are quick, and smooth-feeling. The only drawback is that all menu configuration is done by editing text files, but then again, maybe that's not a drawback...
    The real n-tier system:

    FreeBSD -> PostgreSQL -> [any_language] -> Apache -> Mozilla/XUL

    Amazon wishlist -- rycamor (at) gmail.com
Page 1 of 2 12 Last
  • Jump to page:

IMN logo majestic logo threadwatch logo seochat tools logo