|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
your opinion on easiest email server to run
In your opinion, what is your easiest email to run?
Argosoft: The easiest to run. I use the DNS server on my router and it work. Does not have alot of feature. No reply to all on the webend and no calendar. Exchange 2003: This one is so hard to get it up and running. I am still reading on it. Imail: I got it and I have not try. Keriol(sp): Got it and still have not try it out. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
qmail - very secure, clean, easy-to-run and administer.
__________________
Alex (http://www.alex-greg.com) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've been using merak for a couple of years and its super easy to administrate.
URL |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would say groupwise is the most flexible and robust as well it is easy to setup and runs on Novell, Linux, Microsoft.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
argosoft is prob the easiest but it does severly lack in features and extendability, they also killed their community off by canceling 'argostuff'
Postfix is awsome as far as maintaince, but the setup is a )&#$)&@) IMO, then again almost any linux/unix installation blows. @Mail is one of the best servers, however it can get kinda expensive as it scales up. the minimum server is about $300 though which is reasonable for a small business. Exchange is insecure, and i wouldnt trust it at all. Not to mention it reduced overall system security, is slow, expensive etc.
__________________
Visit my site Avitar.net for great Atricles on Project Managment, Web Development, and System Administration.
|
![]() |
| Viewing: Dev Shed Forums > System Administration > Mail Server Help > your opinion on easiest email server to run |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|