|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi!
I post this text 1 year ago. But no one really could give me an answer. This is the text that I posted long time ago: I have a fundamental question about The way .NET handles the object orientated way of Persistence. I am coming from JAVA and WebObjects (Apple) World and I am looking for a convenient way of working with objects without seeing any SQL statements only objects. I have used that approach for years on the WebObjects Platform (Enterprise Object Framework) and in Java recently (Container Managed Persistence). I am looking for something like that in the Microsoft world. As far as I understand Microsoft does not distinguish between the Object Model and the Relational Model. The main difference is that the Object model allows n : m relationships and the Relational does not allow them. Here a small example to visualize the problem: Example: There is a Patient object with following Attributes String patientGUID; String name; Int age; Hashtable diseases; (or some other Container like Collection or Array) And there is a Disease Object String diseaseGUID; String name; In the object Model there is relation between Patient and Disease where the patient has his diseases but on the other site one disease can belong to 1..* patients. (n : m) That n : m relationship can not exist within a relational database without a link table that contains the connections between the tables: Patient and Disease. Now, I would like to connect the object Model containing TWO Entities (Patient, Disease) with the relational database (containing THREE tables). Then I want to work with my objects; e.g. create new diseases connect them to existing patients by putting the diseases into the array or create new Patients and connect them with already existing diseases or just change a Patients name. When I am finished I just want to say SAVECHANGES and the database is updated accordingly including all link table entries. So all I have to care about are my objects and the relations between them, some invisible layer does all the dirty work like building SQL, converting the data types and caching. So if I fetch a Patient with a specified GUID I do not have to care about fetching his diseases. They are fetched automatically. If there are too many Diseases I do not care some kind of algorithm handles that problem in such a way that if I have to search all of them for something they are simply there. They are loaded on demand (lazy evaluation) Supposing that the disease has a further connection with some DiseaseType Object/Table and that table has an attribute/column "Description" I can access it by typing the following code: TextField1.Text = currentDisease.type().description() Please note that to retrieve the description value I did only fetch the Patient. The diseases and its types were fetched automatically. Is something like that possible or am I excepting too much of the .NET? ------------------------------------------------------------------- This tool should be a mixture between Microsoft Visio (I mean ORM modelling) and a good object-to-relational mapping tool. Is something like that NOW available???? thx! gicio |
![]() |
| Viewing: Dev Shed Forums > Programming Languages - More > .Net Development > O/R Mapping tool like Apple has.....for .NET?!?! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|