Discuss Fixed IP internet connection problems in the Networking Help forum on Dev Shed. Fixed IP internet connection problems Networking Help forum discussing issues such as routers, switches, small networks, file sharing etc. Find information for both wired and wireless networks.
Posts: 4
Time spent in forums: 1 h 11 m 30 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Fixed IP internet connection problems
Here’s the problem. I have a network with cabled and wifi connections to the gateway router. The wifi connections connect the network and the internet no problem. The cabled connections connect the network ok, but cannot connect to the internet. I get 400 error Bad Request for any attempt to browse the web.
The wifi connections use DHCP in the range 192.168.1.100-149. The LAN connects are using fixed IPs assigned at the NIC in the range 192.168.1.10-52. The router is 192.168.1.1 and cabled to 2 access points (DHCP and NAT disabled) 192.168.1.2 and 3. At each NIC the fixed IP setting is 192.168.1.10-54, subnet mask 255.255.255.0. Now the LAN cabled connections are cabled to either the gateway or one of the access points. I had originally set the default gateway to 192.168.1.1 but have tried .2 and .3 (these are the access point fixed IPS, trying to get the internet connection going). If I look at the network connection it does say there is Internet Access but all my browsing attempts comeback with an error 400 Bad Request.
BTW, the cabled connections are servers which do not need to be internet connected on an ongoing basis except to update virus definitions, or other OS updates. I have experimented with a wifi dongle on each when I need it to connect the internet and that seems ok but I would like, instead, to be able to go to the router and just set the internet accessibility times for those machines using the LAN cabling
Additional info. the LAN cabled PCs are WinXP Pro and Windows Server 2008
Posts: 2,198
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 6 Days 22 h 13 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 2735
can you do an ipconfig /all on one of the boxes that doesn't work? Let's check the setup there. Also, the gateway you had should be correct (192.168.1.1) since it's the router.
Also try a nslookup for a commone website (www.microsoft.com or www.google.com)
Also ping one of those addresses.
If you can lookup OK, and you can ping ok, it's not a connection problem.
Posts: 4
Time spent in forums: 1 h 11 m 30 sec
Reputation Power: 0
In short...working from one of the problem PCs all the wifi and LAN PCs can ping each other no problem. NSLOOKUP returns an error ...unknown server...'
From the CMD prompt...the ipconfig /all you requested is down at the bottom.
Thanks for your attention.
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\Administrator>ping 192.168.1.102 (this pings a wifi connected laptop with internet access)
Pinging 192.168.1.102 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.102: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.102: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.102: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.102: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.102:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 6ms
C:\Users\Administrator>ping 192.168.1.50 (this pings a LAN connected PC with a fixed IP)
Pinging 192.168.1.50 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.50: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.50: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.50: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.50: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.50:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
C:\Users\Administrator>ping 192.168.1.51 (this pings a LAN connected PC with a fixed IP)
Pinging 192.168.1.51 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.51: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.51: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.51: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.51: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.51:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 0ms
C:\Users\Administrator>ping 192.168.1.52 (this pings a LAN connected PC with a fixed IP)
Pinging 192.168.1.52 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.52: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.52: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.52: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.52: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.52:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
C:\Users\Administrator>nslookup microsoft.com (nsLookup from the LAN connected PC)
Server: UnKnown
Address: fec0:0:0:ffff::1
*** UnKnown can't find microsoft.com: No response from server
C:\Users\Administrator>nslookup google.com (nsLookup from the LAN connected PC)
Server: UnKnown
Address: fec0:0:0:ffff::1
*** UnKnown can't find google.com: No response from server
C:\Users\Administrator>ipconfig /all (ipconfig form the LAN connected PC)
Posts: 2,198
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 6 Days 22 h 13 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 2735
Looks like you have no DNS servers listed. In your configuration you need to list 192.168.0.1 as a DNS Server. Actually, the preferred one will be your ISP's DNS server, so find out what those are (two is better than one) and put that in.
Posts: 4
Time spent in forums: 1 h 11 m 30 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamPI
Looks like you have no DNS servers listed. In your configuration you need to list 192.168.0.1 as a DNS Server. Actually, the preferred one will be your ISP's DNS server, so find out what those are (two is better than one) and put that in.
To clarify then, for each NIC to which I have a static IP defined I need to define a DNS server 192.168.0.1, and preferable a second one from the ISP, is this correct?
On a side note, is this a standard set up, the DNS server? My software vendor who set up those static IP boxes had been struggling with the missing internet connection for 3 weeks before I took it up. Should they have known this, since their application is the one that required static IPs?
Posts: 2,198
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 6 Days 22 h 13 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 2735
the 192.168.0.1 is a good start, good troubleshooting because most SOHO routers will also pass on DNS queries. Ideally you should have 2 from your ISP. Try pinging any of these:
If any of those ping right (from one of the non-working computers) your *connection* is fine. It's your inability to look up DNS hostnames that is the problem. And yes, if this is the solution that works it out any basic level of troubleshooting should have caught this.
Posts: 4
Time spent in forums: 1 h 11 m 30 sec
Reputation Power: 0
PRoblem Solved
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamPI
the 192.168.0.1 is a good start, good troubleshooting because most SOHO routers will also pass on DNS queries. Ideally you should have 2 from your ISP. Try pinging any of these:
If any of those ping right (from one of the non-working computers) your *connection* is fine. It's your inability to look up DNS hostnames that is the problem. And yes, if this is the solution that works it out any basic level of troubleshooting should have caught this.
Outstanding AdamPI!!
As you predicted, I was able to ping the Google addresses no problem. I got two DNS servers from my ISP by 'ipconfig /all' from the wifi connected machines. After entering them in the DNS servers of the static IP set ups I got my connection.
I'm now trying to figure out how to bill my vendor for something they should have been able to do. Even if all they did was get on one of these forums...
Posts: 2,198
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 6 Days 22 h 13 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 2735
Glad to see it was an easy one. Taking things out one piece at a time is the ONLY way to effectively troubleshoot. There are several ways to go about it, but in the end, it comes down to: eliminate, test, repeat.