Photoshop Help
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
FaxWave - Free Trial.
Go Back   Dev Shed ForumsWeb DesignPhotoshop Help

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread Dev Shed Forums Sponsor:
  #1  
Old September 24th, 2003, 04:52 PM
INE-Kpro... INE-Kpro... is offline
Contributing User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 113 INE-Kpro... User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 17 h 38 m 7 sec
Reputation Power: 5
Jpeg or GIFs? Image compression?

Which is better and why, to use for Webdesign or flash design, or design which requires a smaller file of images. Which is more flexible and more compatible in general as well.

Be blunt about it and as detailed if you can. I am trying to figure out which format to work in. I currently use jpegs and save it for web, but I am so concerned about what quality to use. I currently use 60 as a general rule, but I would like to know what most people use as a general. eg. For images full color I usually use 60, for images with mainly 3 colors 40. I know its see and decide, but theres a general rule that people use that can help me work off. Even with 2 colors I find that some files are bigger depending what colors they are, why? Does anyone know how color affects the size of the file. I want to try to optimise my webdesigns the best I can.

cheers
TIA
__________________
INE-Kpro...
(eye-yen-kay pro)
http://www.INE-Kpro.com
enquiries@INE-Kpro.com
<--- watch this space --->

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 24th, 2003, 05:20 PM
Ucht's Avatar
Ucht Ucht is offline
This is only a test
Dev Shed Frequenter (2500 - 2999 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Off the air
Posts: 2,893 Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Month 5 Days 20 h 1 m 43 sec
Reputation Power: 147
It really depends on the picture you're using. A few rules of thumb:

If it's a photo, go jpg (gif's are limited to 256 colors, and photos often need more)
If it's a drawing, go gif (jpgs tend to create 'artifacts' around the edges of differently-colored elements, and they're pretty obvious and ugly in pics with solid colors)
You shouldn't run into many pic/jpgs you need to run higher than 60, and many will look fine at 30
Don't run gifs lower than 8 colors; you'll start to lose the integrity of your edges
Only run gifs at 256 colors if there's a lot of detail (mainly in shading); if there's a big difference between 256 and 128, you may be better off using jpg
Smaller pics are usually better as gifs, even if they're photos

Remember these are very general rules; your mileage may vary.

Also remember that jpg doesn't support transparency or animation.
__________________
"Not to offend our Swedish listeners ... if we have any, that is—"
"—But your team's rubbish."
(Sun webcast, Sweden vs. Paraguay)

Who needs corporate radio?
WeFunkRadio.com | Global Pop Conspiracy | Radio Paradise | SomaFM | The Classic Soul Network | Boot Liquor | WFMU Freeform Radio

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 24th, 2003, 08:40 PM
INE-Kpro... INE-Kpro... is offline
Contributing User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 113 INE-Kpro... User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 17 h 38 m 7 sec
Reputation Power: 5
isnt when ur doing saving for web in photoshop, its only 256 colors in jpegs. is it good to mix n match jpegs and gifs when using it for website designs both in flash or html.

which is better 256 color jpeg or 256 color gifs?
30 quality jpegs looks blotchy though in PS.

How do you prevent gradients to not look so blotchy in thousands of colors, or is it not preventable?

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 24th, 2003, 09:04 PM
Ucht's Avatar
Ucht Ucht is offline
This is only a test
Dev Shed Frequenter (2500 - 2999 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Off the air
Posts: 2,893 Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Ucht User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Month 5 Days 20 h 1 m 43 sec
Reputation Power: 147
Can't help you with flash, but it's often advantageous (if not necessary) to mix jpgs and gifs in html pages.

As for comparing jpg and gif quality: it all depends on the picture. I find 30-quality jpg works fine with most photos -- not perfect, but perfectly acceptable for the file size. For some pictures, a 256-color gif may look better, but the file size is far too high. The same goes for most jpgs over 60 quality.

I have found that for most pics, if I have to go over 60 to make it look decent, I'm usually better off making it a gif. Or just sucking it up for file size and have it not look as nice as I'd like. Again, it depends on what you're working with.

Another thing you can do to help blotchiness in jpgs is a little bit of blurring. You can set it in the save for web properties. I've never been able to set it higher than .2, though, before it's been too blurry for my tastes. But even that little can help with artifacts.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 25th, 2003, 12:15 AM
moot moot is offline
Junior Member
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 9 moot User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 0
in general you make photographs and photograph quality images jpg, other images like text on white or cartoonish looking stuff gifs

jpg keeps track of every pixel
gif keeps track of shapes of color

when using photoshop to create images for websites always 'save for web'. once there it's easy to switch between gif and jpeg, check the size of the output file, the smaller the sized output file is the one to go with. if the gif is using all 256 colors that's a good indication that the image is probably too complex for gif and you should use jpeg.

use 'save for web' to create jpegs, dont go below 60 quality unless it's thumbs or there's some other reason to not care about quality. more and more people have lcd monitors and they require an even higher quality jpeg. i save at 70.

for flash, create a png file for import, flash does its own optimization.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 25th, 2003, 07:35 AM
INE-Kpro... INE-Kpro... is offline
Contributing User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 113 INE-Kpro... User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 17 h 38 m 7 sec
Reputation Power: 5
i know flash does its own optimisation if u set it, but isnt that not as good as optimising it in photoshop. why do i create a png file for import?

can someone help me with my other questions please.

TIA

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: Dev Shed ForumsWeb DesignPhotoshop Help > Jpeg or GIFs? Image compression?


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump

 Free IT White Papers!
 
Accelerating Trading Partner Performance
One in five. That's how many partner transactions have at least one error. That is an amazing statistic, particularly given the extraordinary leaps in innovation across the global supply chain during the past two decades. Download this white paper to learn more.

 
Competing on Analytics
This Tech Analysis is designed to help identify characteristics shared by analytics competitors, and includes information about 32 organizations that have made a commitment to quantitative, fact-based analysis.

 
Cost Effective Scaling with Virtualization and Coyote Point Systems
An overview of the industry trend toward virtualization, how server consolidation has increased the importance of application uptime and the steps being taken to integrate load balancing technology with virtualized servers.

 
Five Checkpoints to Implementing IP Telephony
Implementation planning for IP PBX software and IP telephony has become vital as businesses replace discontinued legacy PBX phone systems. This informative whitepaper outlines five "checkpoints" for any implementation plan that will help make IP communications a successful proposition.

 
Hosted Email Security: Staying Ahead of New Threats
In the last two years, email has become a fierce battleground between the nefarious forces of spam and malware, and the heroes of messaging protection. The spam volumes increased alarmingly every month, bringing clever new forms of phishing and virus propagation attacks.

 

Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 





© 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 2 hosted by Hostway