|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reletive for Absolute links? which is best?
i am wondering which ones spiders will or will not follow when they go to my site...
<a href="http://www.mysite.com/file.php"> or <a href="/file.php"> thanks.
__________________
If This Post Was Useful, Please Click The
Next To My PostSaidan Ryuuza Web Designer | Writer Web Confidence Design Defunct Games Kyou wa Ash!ta no Kinou ![]() -- Failure is not an option! It comes bundled with Windows. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I too am curious about this...
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
They should follow both, but I would be inclined not to use a FQDN for internal links.
__________________
# Jeremy Explain your problem instead of asking how to do what you decided was the solution. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Relative links are shorter (less HTML) and make it easier to move content to a new site if you need to.
As far as search engines are concerned they won't differentiate between absolute or relative links.
__________________
Interested in online gaming? Access full reviews of all UK Online casinos here.
Make Money from home |Roulette Strategy |William Hill | Viurgin | Jackpot joy | Spread Betting UK |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Just thought I'd bump this topic rather than start a new thread of my own. I understand the benefit of including keywords/phrases within link anchor text. However for internal links (ie. links to pages within my own site) with keyword rich link anchor text is there no benefit of using absolute links over relative links? Would using absolute links increase that page's link popularity more so than using relative links? |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
There should be no difference, but keep in mind that it all depends on how the bot is written, and that could be different for different search engines. In theory, in my head, it makes no sense for there to be any difference.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thanks for the quick reply. By the way, excuse my ignorance but what's a FQDN? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
The terms "relative" and "absolute" are usually used incorrectly in reference to href= values. Most people confuse and/or intermix "abosulte" and "FQDN":
href="foo.html" » relative href="../foo.html" » relative href="/foo.html" » absolute href="http://domain.com/foo.html" » FQDN This differs from the meaning of those terms in reference to filesystem locations, in which case FQDN does not apply. |
![]() |
| Viewing: Dev Shed Forums > Web Design > Search Engine Optimization > Reletive for Absolute links? which is best? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|