|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Search engines Readiness review please
Please review my search engines readiness
http://www.onlinebusinesspackage.com My main key word is "online business" |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's quite a ways away from good optimization.
First, drop the table based layout. Some engines consider 'tabular data' less relavent than textual content. You could add to your title. You should tripple your link text prominence. You should mention your keywords a couple times in your alt tags. Your keyword frequency in the body text is 40 times but should be under 15. A good total word count is 300-600 - yours is 2255. You should really make it a 'site' instead of a long page. Split the long page up into different pages. Use good keywords for the page names, link text, etc. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would definitely recommend adding more pages. You need to aim for 50+ for Google to recognise this as a site, rather than as a one page advert (which of course is actually what it is).
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
50 pages !???
where did you read about this tip? not to say you are wrong. im only just learning about real optimization. number of pages in a site is great tip to keep in mind, but i have seen plenty of high ranked sites with much less than 50. wouldn't it be less likely for a spider to down the rank of a site with too much content for a user to possibly take in ? almost as if it was a sign for overkill. im very interested in this subject. i'd love to hear any input you may have. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Yes, but the point is that there is no (legal) way to optimize that single page to be competitive in any aspect. 50 pages is a good figure. 10 is enough already. 50,000 is better though. Consider the (statistical) amount of back-links you can possibly get... His choice of key words / phrase is the worst possible one could choose for his type of business. This is IMO the main problem. M.
__________________
-- Manuel Hirsch - Linux, FreeBSD, programming, administration articles, tutorials and more. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
im assuming then that any site with the meta
robots=INDEX, NOFOLLOW will most likely never see a high rank. correct? if so, then my next question would have to relate to the comparison between the robot meta listed above, combined with good link popularity. say google's spider finds your link on thousands of other sites, but its never able to search thru more than the homepage of your site itself, due to the meta. does popularity always override all other features, or would the meta really hold that much weight on your rank determination? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
The "meta" tags don't matter at all for google AFAIK.
|
![]() |
| Viewing: Dev Shed Forums > Web Design > Search Engine Optimization > Search engines Readiness review please |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|