Search Engine Optimization
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   Dev Shed ForumsWeb DesignSearch Engine Optimization

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread Dev Shed Forums Sponsor:
  #1  
Old December 13th, 2005, 05:31 PM
mcraft59 mcraft59 is offline
Contributing User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 157 mcraft59 User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level)mcraft59 User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level)mcraft59 User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 4 h 16 m 54 sec
Reputation Power: 5
Table Summary

I'm currently converting my companys primary navigation bar from a table layout to an unordered list.

The table-nav uses the summary tag with keywords for each page and these keywords change dynamically based on the page content. My new CSS design will no longer have these tables and these summary tags will be gone. Our lead developer warned me that the SEO guy is probably going to pitch a fit about these summary tags being removed. So any suggestions on things I can do to replace these tags, or are these summary tags a waste anyways and probably don't affect seo, and if so anyone have a link so I say "there" to the guy.

thanks
__________________
your advertisement here!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 13th, 2005, 09:11 PM
jharnois's Avatar
jharnois jharnois is offline
mod_dev_shed
Dev Shed God 19th Plane (14000 - 14499 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 14,299 jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)jharnois User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Month 1 Week 2 Days 1 h 54 m 17 sec
Reputation Power: 760
The title= attribute will probably work just as well and is supported by both lists elements and links.
__________________
# Jeremy

Explain your problem instead of asking how to do what you decided was the solution.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 14th, 2005, 09:20 AM
mcraft59 mcraft59 is offline
Contributing User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 157 mcraft59 User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level)mcraft59 User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level)mcraft59 User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 4 h 16 m 54 sec
Reputation Power: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by jharnois
The title= attribute will probably work just as well and is supported by both lists elements and links.


Cool, I'll see if I can sell it.

thanks!

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old December 28th, 2005, 11:57 AM
mcraft59 mcraft59 is offline
Contributing User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 157 mcraft59 User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level)mcraft59 User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level)mcraft59 User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 4 h 16 m 54 sec
Reputation Power: 5
Nope I got shot down. We outsource our SEO to another company and when I suggested the use of 'title' attribute on an unordered list on a section of web-standard html I got yelled at. And the SEO guy is insisting that the code me ripped out and replaced with a table. He claims that table summaries are what make the world of google go round. Anyone have any articles laying around that say table summaries are the suck?

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 14th, 2006, 04:03 AM
linkoovi linkoovi is offline
Registered User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1 linkoovi User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 17 m 34 sec
Reputation Power: 0
hmm

I had a experience with a company that whanted the site to be build in div tags no tables, thay said that site with divs css is beter for SEO, Im not so certain about that, but i know that div tags can not replace tables in high graphic design.
And afcourse the opera, firefox, mozila, IE difrently interpreted the layer cod.

I was wondering is div tags realy beter then tables for SEO?

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 15th, 2006, 11:57 PM
Catacaustic's Avatar
Catacaustic Catacaustic is offline
Contributing User
Dev Shed Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: A Land Down Under
Posts: 353 Catacaustic User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)Catacaustic User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)Catacaustic User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)Catacaustic User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)Catacaustic User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)Catacaustic User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 4 Days 8 h 38 m 44 sec
Reputation Power: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by linkoovi
I was wondering is div tags realy beter then tables for SEO?
The idea of divs Vs. tables comes down to one deciding factor... Which one will leave you with less actual code on the page. This is really the only concern that there is with this battle.

DIV's and CSS are great for doing a lot of stuff, but they aren't the be-all-and-end-all of design that some people woudl have us think. Tables do still definately have a place in design these days. The trick is knowing when and where to use each one.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: Dev Shed ForumsWeb DesignSearch Engine Optimization > Table Summary


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump


Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 





© 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 1 hosted by Hostway