|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That's a better idea. I ended up leaving an impression that I don't want the owners getting income or something. Yeah. Does JCaputo regularily update the vB version, (although this may take a long long time), I think it's worth it. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Anyone know what version of vB this forum is running?
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
- "Cryptographically secure linear feedback shift register based stream ciphers" -- a phrase that'll get any party started. - Why know the ordinary when you can understand the extraordinary? - Sponsor my caffeine addiction! (36.70 USD recieved so far -- Latest donor: Mark Foxvog) |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It just proves the existence of top-secret classified cabal. I'm still wondering about the version. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
I believe it's 3.5.3
But don't hold me to that. Regardless of teh current version, JC has already stated several times that he isn't likely to upgrade to the latest and greatest version of vBulletin due to the sheer number of hacks implemented on the Dev sites.
__________________
Asker of questions and all-around annoying guy. ![]() For difficult hardware problems, go to the Hard Side™-- DevHardware Forums |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Damn then. Maybe someone will make a 404 hack then. ![]() I wonder if JC will ever participate in this conversation. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Does that mean that he went through upgrading in Jan 3rd? (about 9 days ago) I find that quite hard to believe. |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Last update, 7 Jan 2005, that's a definitive answer.
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I see. As long as he updates at some point, it would work. It's nothing desparate anyway. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
In accordance with one of Jacob Nielsen's articles, where he states that a 404 message should obey the following:
Quote:
In order to use the 404 "response" to a greater potential, instead of being redirected to the homepage, the user could be redirected to a search page with the search results for a digested version of the original URL (possibly spell-checked?). To keep the whole thing within DevShed, the user would be redirected to igrep. This would, at the same time, give more exposure to DevShed's own search engine. Additionally, to keep advertising revenue in tact, the user could be presented with a set of ads (pertinent to the search). Optionally this could be implemented only if the request originated from a 404 error (via a GET/POST parameter or similar). ![]() |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not really necessary, you can still use the search field at the top right of the page when you get to an 'invalid thread' error page...
__________________
Support requests via PM will be ignored! |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Yea, but that way it would be more obvious. And people would become more familiar with igrep, which will give it a bit more recognition. Just an idea. ![]() |
|
#28
|
||||
|