|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
Dev Shed Forums Sponsor:
|
|
Generate data entry and reporting .NET Web apps in minutes, straight from your database. Read our FREE whitepaper “Build Web 2.0 Applications Without Hand-Coding” Download now! |
|
#31
April 25th, 2005, 07:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you look in the Forum Hacks Information thread, there is
a list of the post counts you need for certain belts.
|
|
#32
April 25th, 2005, 01:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
k thanks.
__________________
Free Random Signature , Avatar Hosting http://freebsd.munk.nu/ http://jez.hancock-family.com/
|
|
#33
May 2nd, 2005, 06:33 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
One thing on the rep system that annoys me is getting -- rep for a moderating decision, ie, closing a thread because it shouldn't be open (not in the lounge - other forums)...
__________________
|
|
#34
May 2nd, 2005, 06:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Where's that happened?
Someone in the lounge actually complained cos a mod had --'d him or her once the thread had been deleted. Maybe it would be possible to have rep disabled in locked/deleted threads...? If you're upset that edwin got that many ++'s for closing the thread in the lounge, it's no big deal, it's just the first thread I came accross when searching his posts. I judt thought he needed more rep, as his contribution largely goes by un-noticed by most.
__________________
Support requests via PM will be ignored! Last edited by ChiefWigs1982 : May 2nd, 2005 at 06:43 AM.
|
|
#36
May 2nd, 2005, 06:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, ok, that's pretty stupid.
|
|
#37
May 2nd, 2005, 07:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If it's worth closing, it's usually worth deleting. Also, you don't have to post "thread closed"... just close the damn thing. Then no one can hurt your feelings or your precious rep.
---John Holmes...
|
|
#38
May 2nd, 2005, 03:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
people just don't like you, dude, haven't you figured that out?   the rep will always fall unevenly and unfarily, and on you perhaps more so
__________________
- "Cryptographically secure linear feedback shift register based stream ciphers" -- a phrase that'll get any party started. - Why know the ordinary when you can understand the extraordinary?   - Sponsor my caffeine addiction! (36.70 USD recieved so far -- Latest donor: Mark Foxvog)
|
|
#39
May 2nd, 2005, 03:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
but, but, my mommy says i'm special. or am I special in the bad kinda way? :'( :'(
|
|
#41
May 2nd, 2005, 05:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Weighing in late on this conversation, however...
I see how the rep system can be overly abused just by looking at the number of greenies people are sporting around these forums. If you can believe it, there's bitching over in DevHardware about the rep system being abused there and there are only four people with double greenies. It's been suggested and I wholly endorse finding a method to "dial up" a rep. By this I meant that the powerhouse 8, 10, 16 rep power guys could rep a person 2 or 3 points as they deem necessary (up or down within already established parameters) rather than being hobbled with wielding the full power of their rep. I know I certainly wouldn't want to be slammed for -8 rep points for something that could've been worth -2 otherwise. Conversely, I feel that the extra greenie I earned in Devhardware by 1,2,and 3 point increments is that much more deserved than the second greenie I will eventually earn here, if only because I amassed 30-some points off three reps alone. Not that I am complaining about getting rep points, and I am sure I am earning quite a few negatives just by writing this, but it's just the way I percieve things. And regardless of the number of greenies I have (or reds, for that matter), it will not affect the quality (or lack thereof) of the posts I generate. FWIW, YMMV, OMGWTFBBQ
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
