|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
Dev Shed Forums Sponsor:
|
|
|
|
#1
October 27th, 2005, 01:43 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Design Resolution
First, I understand the goodness of CSS and websites that expand and contract depending on the browser size (variable width, and such).
Having said that, if I needed or for some reason wanted a design that didn't shrink smaller than a certain size (say there was some visual element or a table that contained tabular data that really needed to be a certain width), can I safely assume that most people no longer us 800 x 600 much and most are 1024x768 or up? Or would that be a bad assumption? I desperately want to be able to rationalize / justify a minimum 1024x768 design parameter...
__________________
If it don't involve dynamite, it ain't gonna work.
|
|
#2
October 27th, 2005, 02:04 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I use 1024x768, but my browser windows are rarely set wider than 950.
Lots of people still use 800x600
__________________
Spreading knowledge, one newbie at a time. Learn CSS. | PHP includes | X/HTML Validator | CSS validator | Dynamic Site Solutions Design/program for Firefox (and/or Opera), apply fixes for IE, not the other way around. I'm looking for new clients.
|
|
| Viewing: Dev Shed Forums > Web Design > Web Design Help > Design Resolution |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
