September 14th, 2003, 10:46 PM
i need to get this site reviewed for a couple of things:
3) cross-browser compatible(most likely very low due to the use of frames)
4) user friendliness
this is one of my clients sites i have been working on for a while and i just needed to know how well it is for people viewing it other than on mine or my client's cp.
September 15th, 2003, 04:15 AM
why use a splash screen?
and why use frames?,
and as you say, the page isn't very cross-browser compatible.( not because of the frames, but the coding)
several of the pictures doesn't load in mozillaFB and opera,
menu isn't showing in Konqueror
red text on black background is not very good either hard to read.
so one advice clean up the code and get rid of the frames.
October 9th, 2003, 11:57 AM
Using frames can lead to a big hole. Meaning, friendly search engine won't be able to index your site and add your pages in their webpage. Not unless if the spider came from a large nest of search engines, this wont be a problem. just a thought
It's not pretty convenient with me because I'm seeing a black background with no extra color to share the interactivity with your navigation.
Cross Browser Compatible.
Just my 2 cents.
Good luck in your future revision.
October 11th, 2003, 02:03 AM
October 13th, 2003, 07:54 AM
no the pictures do still not load.
probably because of the trailing ../ in the images path's
lots of wrong css,
use of the same id for several elements,
lack of length values. px % or em, for
several elements, ( both in height/widths and postions)
wrong id names.
this causes mozilla to ignore style,
see attached image, viewing the news page.
i would recomend that you check both your html and css with w3c.org's validators
October 19th, 2003, 06:16 PM
yeah, recently i just noticed that....took me long enough, hehe...and on some of the pages ive chanegd the #12 in my css to .12 and used it as a class....and i really had no clue that the ../ wasnt supported by some browsers...hmm
well thank you for your suggestions and for the link